AI IN IMAGING AND THERAPY: INNOVATIONS, ETHICS, AND IMPACT: REVIEW ARTICLE AI pitfalls and what not to do: mitigating bias in AI

211Citations
Citations of this article
166Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Various forms of artificial intelligence (AI) applications are being deployed and used in many healthcare systems. As the use of these applications increases, we are learning the failures of these models and how they can perpetuate bias. With these new lessons, we need to prioritize bias evaluation and mitigation for radiology applications; all the while not ignoring the impact of changes in the larger enterprise AI deployment which may have downstream impact on performance of AI models. In this paper, we provide an updated review of known pitfalls causing AI bias and discuss strategies for mitigating these biases within the context of AI deployment in the larger healthcare enterprise. We describe these pitfalls by framing them in the larger AI lifecycle from problem definition, data set selection and curation, model training and deployment emphasizing that bias exists across a spectrum and is a sequela of a combination of both human and machine factors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gichoya, J. W., Thomas, K., Celi, L. A., Safdar, N., Banerjee, I., Banja, J. D., … Purkayastha, S. (2023, October 1). AI IN IMAGING AND THERAPY: INNOVATIONS, ETHICS, AND IMPACT: REVIEW ARTICLE AI pitfalls and what not to do: mitigating bias in AI. British Journal of Radiology. British Institute of Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20230023

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free