Impact of infectious disease consultation on quality of care, mortality, and length of stay in staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: Results from a large multicenter cohort study

210Citations
Citations of this article
161Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. We assessed the impact of infectious disease (ID) consultation on management and outcome in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB). Methods. A retrospective cohort study examined consecutive SAB patients from 6 academic and community hospitals between 2007 and 2010. Quality measures of management including echocardiography, repeat blood culture, removal of infectious foci, and antibiotic therapy were compared between ID consultation (IDC) and no ID consultation (NIDC) groups. A competing risk model with propensity score adjustment was used to compare in-hospital mortality and time to discharge. Results. Of 847 SAB patients, 506 (60%) patients received an ID consultation and 341 (40%) patients did not. Echocardiography was done for 371 (73%) IDC and 191 (56%) NIDC patients (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bai, A. D., Showler, A., Burry, L., Steinberg, M., Ricciuto, D. R., Fernandes, T., … Morris, A. M. (2015). Impact of infectious disease consultation on quality of care, mortality, and length of stay in staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: Results from a large multicenter cohort study. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 60(10), 1451–1461. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ120

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free