Infection Rate Comparison during Transition from Hospital to Office WALANT Enabled by Virtual Reality

6Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: We transitioned our hand practice from the operating room (OR) to our office-based procedure room (OPR) to offer wide-awake, local anesthesia, no tourniquet (WALANT). We have established that using wide-awake virtual reality improves patient comfort and anxiety during wide-awake procedures and helps facilitate our patients' choice of venue. We aimed to assess the effect of this transition on infection rates for procedures performed by a single surgeon in the OR versus the OPR. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on a single surgeon's adult patients who underwent elective and closed traumatic upper limb surgeries. A surgical site infection was defined as superficial or deep, based on clinical examination conducted by the surgeon, and was treated with antibiotics within a 4-week postoperative window. Results: From August 2017 to August 2019, 538 (216 OR and 322 OPR) consecutive cases met inclusion criteria. There were six (2.78%) superficial infections and zero deep space infections in the OR cohort compared with four (1.24%) superficial and zero deep space infections in the OPR cohort with no statistical significance. Two-thirds of cases were converted to WALANT and delivered in the office. Conclusions: This narrative study concurs with the current literature that WALANT in the office setting is as safe as the hospital OR-based procedures for selected elective cases. By transitioning suitable cases from the OR to the OPR, a surgeon's overall infection rate should not change.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oakes, T. C., Wong, K. C., Schank, K. J., Haan, P., Bray, S. M., & Clarkson, J. H. W. (2022). Infection Rate Comparison during Transition from Hospital to Office WALANT Enabled by Virtual Reality. In Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open (Vol. 10, p. e4285). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004285

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free