Sensitivity of inferences in forensic genetics to assumptions about founding genes

22Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Many forensic genetics problems can be handled using structured systems of discrete variables, for which Bayesian networks offer an appealing practical modeling framework, and allow inferences to be computed by probability propagation methods. However, when standard assumptions are violated-for example, when allele frequencies are unknown, there is identity by descent or the population is heterogeneous-dependence is generated among founding genes, that makes exact calculation of conditional probabilities by propagation methods less straightforward. Here we illustrate different methodologies for assessing sensitivity to assumptions about founders in forensic genetics problems. These include constrained steepest descent, linear fractional programming and representing dependence by structure. We illustrate these methods on several forensic genetics examples involving criminal identification, simple and complex disputed paternity and DNA mixtures. © Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2009.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Green, P. J., & Mortera, J. (2009). Sensitivity of inferences in forensic genetics to assumptions about founding genes. Annals of Applied Statistics, 3(2), 731–763. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-AOAS235

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free