Glucose response curve and type 2 diabetes risk in latino adolescents

68Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE - In adults, the shape of the glucose response during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) prospectively and independently predicts type 2 diabetes. However, no reports have described the utility of this indicator in younger populations. The purpose of this study was to compare type 2 diabetes risk factors in Latino adolescents characterized by either a monophasic or biphasic glucose response during an OGTT. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - A total of 156 nondiabetic Latino adolescents completed a 2-h OGTT. Monophasic and biphasic groups were compared for the following type 2 diabetes risk factors: fasting and 2-h glucose, HbA1c, glucose area under the curve (AUC), insulin sensitivity (Matsuda index), insulin secretion (insulinogenic index), and β-cell function as measured by the disposition index (insulin sensitivity x insulin secretion). RESULTS - Of the participants, 107 youth were categorized as monophasic and 49 were biphasic. Compared with the monophasic group, participants with a biphasic response exhibited lower HbA1c (5.4 6 0.3 vs. 5.6 ± 0.3%, P , 0.01) and lower glucose AUC (14,205 ± 2,382 vs. 16,230 ± 2,537 mg·dL-1·h -1, P , 0.001) with higher insulin sensitivity (5.4 ± 3.2 vs. 4.6 ± 3.4, P # 0.05), higher insulin secretion (2.1 ± 1.3 vs. 1.8 ± 1.3, P = 0.05), and better β-cell function (10.3 ± 7.8 vs. 6.0 ± 3.6, P < 0.001). Differences persisted after adjusting for age, sex, and BMI. CONCLUSIONS - These data suggest that the glycemic response to an OGTT may differentiate risk for type 2 diabetes in youth. This responsemay be an early marker of type 2 diabetes risk among high-risk youth. © 2012 by the American Diabetes Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, J. Y., Mandarino, L. J., Coletta, D. K., & Shaibi, G. Q. (2012). Glucose response curve and type 2 diabetes risk in latino adolescents. Diabetes Care, 35(9), 1925–1930. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc11-2476

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free