Needles and straw in haystacks: Empirical BAYES estimates of possibly sparse sequences

314Citations
Citations of this article
110Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

An empirical Bayes approach to the estimation of possibly sparse sequences observed in Gaussian white noise is set out and investigated. The prior considered is a mixture of an atom of probability at zero and a heavy-tailed density y, with the mixing weight chosen by marginal maximum likelihood, in the hope of adapting between sparse and dense sequences. If estimation is then carried out using the posterior median, this is a random thresholding procedure. Other thresholding rules employing the same threshold can also be used. Probability bounds on the threshold chosen by the marginal maximum likelihood approach lead to overall risk bounds over classes of signal sequences of length n, allowing for sparsity of various kinds and degrees. The signal classes considered are "nearly black" sequences where only a proportion η is allowed to be nonzero, and sequences with normalized l p norm bounded by η, for η > 0 and 0 > p ≥ 2. Estimation error is measured by mean qth power loss, for 0 < q < 2. For all the classes considered, and for all q in (0, 2], the method achieves the optimal estimation rate as n → ∞ and η → 0 at various rates, and in this sense adapts automatically to the sparseness or otherwise of the underlying signal. In addition the risk is uniformly bounded over all signals. If the posterior mean is used as the estimator, the results still hold for q > 1. Simulations show excellent performance. For appropriately chosen functions y, the method is computationally tractable and software is available. The extension to a modified thresholding method relevant to the estimation of very sparse sequences is also considered. © Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2004.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Johnstone, I. M., & Silverman, B. W. (2004). Needles and straw in haystacks: Empirical BAYES estimates of possibly sparse sequences. Annals of Statistics, 32(4), 1594–1649. https://doi.org/10.1214/009053604000000030

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free