Predicting outcome after cardiac surgery: Comparison of global haemodynamic and tonometric variables

22Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To compare how outcome can be predicted from global haemodynamic compared with regional perfusion-related variables (gastric intramucosal pH (pHi) and intramucosal-arterial PCO2 difference (ΔPCO2)), we measured global haemodynamics, gastric pHi and ΔPCO2 in 68 haemodynamically compromised patients after cardiac surgery on admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and 12 h later. Overall mortality rate in the ICU was 19.1%. In non-survivors, mean arterial pressure on admission (P = 0.03) and at 12 h (P = 0.02) was lower, and mean pulmonary artery pressure on admission (P = 0.006) and at 12 h (P = 0.004) was higher than in survivors. Gastric pHi on admission and at 12 h did not differ between non-survivors and survivors (7.37 (SD 0.1) vs 7.39 (0.09), and 7.37 (0.1) vs 7.41 (0.09), respectively). ΔPCO2 on admission and at 12 h did not differ between non-survivors and survivors (0.52 (0.52) kPa vs 0.47 (1.01) kPa and 0.59 (0.7) kPa vs 0.62 (0.9) kPa, respectively). Our data showed that global, routinely monitored, haemodynamic variables are better early predictors of outcome after cardiac surgery than regional, tonometric variables. This conclusion does not support hypoperfusion of the gastrointestinal tract as an early determinant of outcome after cardiac surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bams, J. L., Mariani, M. A., & Groeneveld, A. B. J. (1999). Predicting outcome after cardiac surgery: Comparison of global haemodynamic and tonometric variables. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 82(1), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/82.1.33

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free