Optimal quantification of functional mitral regurgitation: Comparison of volumetric and proximal isovelocity surface area methods to predict outcome

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effective orifice area (EOA) ≥0.2 cm2 or regurgitant volume (Rvol) ≥30 mL predicts prognostic significance in functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). Both volumetric and proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) methods enable calcula-tion of these metrics. To determine their clinical value, we compared EOA and Rvol derived by volumetric and PISA quantita-tion upon outcome of patients with FMR. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined the outcome of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <35% and moderate to severe FMR. All had a complete echocardiogram including EOA and Rvol by both standard PISA and volumetric quantitation using total stroke volume calculated by left ventricular end-diastolic volume×left ventricular ejection fraction and forward flow by Doppler method: EOA=Rvol/mitral regurgitation velocity time integral. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality or heart transplantation. We examined 177 patients: mean left ventricular ejection fraction 25.2% and 34.5% with ischemic cardiomyo-pathy. Echo measurements were greater by PISA than volumetric quantitation: EOA (0.18 versus 0.11 cm2), Rvol (24.7 versus 16.9 mL), and regurgitant fraction (61 versus 37 %) respectively (all P value <0.001). During 3.6±2.3 years’ follow-up, patients with EOA ≥0.2 cm2 or Rvol ≥30 mL had a worse outcome than those with EOA <0.2 cm2 or Rvol <30 mL only by volumetric (log rank P=0.003 and 0.004) but not PISA quantitation (log rank P=0.984 and 0.544), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Volumetric and PISA methods yield different measurements of EOA and Rvol in FMR; volumetric values exhibit greater prognostic significance. The echo method of quantifying FMR may affect the management of this disorder.