10, and in-depth qualitative investigations of a specific language modality or administration of tests of at least two different language modalities, including comprehension, naming, repetition, reading, writing, and spontaneous speech. Results Our search strategy yielded 933 articles on epilepsy and language. Of these, 31 met final eligibility criteria. Most included articles focused on temporal lobe epilepsy; only three studies were interested in the language profile of patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsies, and one study on frontal lobe epilepsy met inclusion criteria. Study results showed a pronounced heterogeneity of language abilities in patients with epilepsy, varying from intact language profiles to impairment in several language functions. However, at least 17% of patients displayed deficits in more than one language function, with naming, reading comprehension, spontaneous speech, and discourse production being most often affected. Significance This review underscores the need to evaluate different language functions - including spontaneous speech, discourse abilities, naming, auditory and reading comprehension, reading, writing, and repetition - individually in order to obtain a reliable profile of language functioning in patients with epilepsy. Moreover, our findings show that in contrast to the huge scientific interest of memory functions in epilepsy, the examination of language functions so far played a minor role in epilepsy research, emphasizing the need for future research activities in this field. © 2014 International League Against Epilepsy.
CITATION STYLE
Bartha-Doering, L., & Trinka, E. (2014). The interictal language profile in adult epilepsy. Epilepsia, 55(10), 1512–1525. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.12743
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.