The feasibility of folk science

105Citations
Citations of this article
124Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

If folk science means individuals having well worked out mechanistic theories of the workings of the world, then it is not feasible. Laypeople's explanatory understandings are remarkably coarse, full of gaps, and often full of inconsistencies. Even worse, most people overestimate their own understandings. Yet recent views suggest that formal scientists may not be so different. In spite of these limitations, science somehow works and its success offers hope for the feasibility of folk science as well. The success of science arises from the ways in which scientists learn to leverage understandings in other minds and to outsource explanatory work through sophisticated methods of deference and simplification of complex systems. Three studies ask whether analogous processes might be present not only in laypeople but also in young children and thereby form a foundation for supplementing explanatory understandings almost from the start of our first attempts to make sense of the world. Copyright © 2010 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Keil, F. C. (2010). The feasibility of folk science. Cognitive Science, 34(5), 826–862. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01108.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free