Management of Acetabular Bone Loss in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: Case Series Presentation

Abstract

Considering the increase in life expectancy in the general population and the need for a more active lifestyle, total hip arthroplasty has become an absolutely necessary surgical intervention to maintain these desired results. Along with the evolution of medicine and the increase in the quality and performance of the materials used to make prostheses, the number of patients who benefit from total hip replacement is constantly increasing, and proportionally, the number of patients who will require revision arthroplasty is increasing. Before discussing the need for hip arthroplasty revision, it is necessary to carry out a rigorous clinical and imaging examination for differential diagnosis with other pathologies such as low back pain, the presence of bone or soft tissue tumors, arterial occlusions and claudication, or other systemic diseases. One of the biggest challenges for the orthopedic surgeon in planning a hip revision is the compensation of the remaining acetabular bone defect, either as a result of the osteolysis process or following the process of removing the acetabular component, which in some cases can lead to severe bone loss that is difficult to anticipate in the preoperative planning. In this paper, we will present the short-term results of the use of reinforcement cages fixed with screws and cemented retentive acetabular cups in the case of hip revisions with extensive bone loss. The discussions that derive from the presented series of cases are related to the use of reinforcement cages, which are based on the principle of primary stability obtained with the help of screw fixation but whose risk of osteolysis and implant fixation damage is greater than in the case of implants that also associate biological integration at bone level. The use of reinforcement cages together with the retentive acetabular cup in the case of elderly patients with associated comorbidities, a moderate level of physical activity, and severe muscle insufficiency at the hip level as a result of not using the affected pelvic limb is still a viable solution that allows the patient to walk immediately after the surgery, avoiding the risk of dislocation (especially in patients who use the posterolateral approach) and avoiding morbidity induced by prolonged bed rest.