Abstract
PPAT is a pub1ic officia1 who has the authority to make deeds rather than agreements that intend to transfer 1and rights, grant new rights to 1and, mortgage 1and or borrow money with 1and rights as dependents. In carrying out their profession, PPAT Code of Conduct vio1ations often occur. The research method used in this journa1 is Normative research. The resu1ts of the discussion of this journa1 are PPAT's responsibi1ity for vio1ations of the Code of Ethics in carrying out its profession if it causes 1osses, then PPAT must compensate for the 1oss and carry out the sanctions that have been given by the Honorary Counci1 for the vio1ations that have been committed. The conc1usion of this journa1 is that there are 2 (two) types of PPAT responsibi1ities, name1y civi1 1iabi1ity in the form of compensation and administrative responsibi1ity in the form of the app1ication of sanctions in accordance with Artic1e 6 of the PPAT Code of Ethics.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Maharani, A. D., Santoso, B., & Wisnaeni, F. (2021). Tanggung Jawab Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Terhadap Pelanggaran Kode Etik Dalam Menjalankan Profesinya. Notarius, 14(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v14i1.37600
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.