The Case for Regime-based Water Quality Standards

84Citations
Citations of this article
133Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Conventional water quality standards have been successful in reducing the concentration of toxic substances in US waters. However, conventional standards are based on simple thresholds and are therefore poorly structured to address human-caused imbalances in dynamic, natural water quality parameters, such as nutrients, sediment, and temperature. A more applicable type of water quality standard - a "regime standard" -would daseiibe desirable distributions of conditions over space and time within a stream network. By mandating the protection and restoration of the aquatic ecosystem dynamics that are required to support beneficial uses in streams, well-designed regime standards would facilitate more effective strategies for management of natural water quality parameters.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Poole, G. C., Dunham, J. B., Keenan, D. M., Sauter, S. T., McCullough, D. A., Mebane, C., … Deppman, M. (2004). The Case for Regime-based Water Quality Standards. In BioScience (Vol. 54, pp. 155–161). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0155:TCFRWQ]2.0.CO;2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free