What's going on in neural constituency parsers? An analysis

60Citations
Citations of this article
148Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A number of differences have emerged between modern and classic approaches to constituency parsing in recent years, with structural components like grammars and featurerich lexicons becoming less central while recurrent neural network representations rise in popularity. The goal of this work is to analyze the extent to which information provided directly by the model structure in classical systems is still being captured by neural methods. To this end, we propose a high-performance neural model (92.08 F1 on PTB) that is representative of recent work and perform a series of investigative experiments. We find that our model implicitly learns to encode much of the same information that was explicitly provided by grammars and lexicons in the past, indicating that this scaffolding can largely be subsumed by powerful general-purpose neural machinery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gaddy, D., Stern, M., & Klein, D. (2018). What’s going on in neural constituency parsers? An analysis. In NAACL HLT 2018 - 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies - Proceedings of the Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 999–1010). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/n18-1091

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free