TOWARDS ENHANCED SURFACE ROUGHNESS MODELING IN MACHINING: AN ANALYSIS OF DATA TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUES

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Data transformation methods are utilized to convert datasets into non-integer formats, potentially altering their distribution patterns. This implies that the variance and standard deviation of the dataset may be altered after the dataset undergoes data transformation operations. Improving model accuracy is a primary application of these methods. This study compares the efficacy of three data transformation techniques: square root transformation, logarithmic transformation, and inverse transformation. The comparison is conducted within the context of developing a surface roughness model for a turning process. Eighteen experiments are performed using the Box-Behnken method, with surface roughness chosen as the response variable. The surface roughness dataset undergoes transformation using the mentioned methods. Four surface roughness regression models are then built: one without transformation, one with square root transformation, one with logarithmic transformation, and one with inverse transformation. Evaluation metrics include coefficient of determination (R-Sq), adjusted coefficient of determination (R-Sq(adj)), Mean Absolute Error (%MAE), and Mean Squared Error (%MSE). Results indicate logarithmic transformation as the most effective, followed by square root transformation, in enhancing model accuracy. The surface roughness model utilizing data transformation exhibits high R-Sq and R-Sq(adj) values, at 0.8792 and 0.7434 respectively. On the other hand, this model has %MAE and %MSE values of only 10.33 and 2.05 respectively. Conversely, inverse transformation exhibits the least effectiveness among the three methods.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thinh, H. X., van Khiem, V., & Giang, N. T. (2024). TOWARDS ENHANCED SURFACE ROUGHNESS MODELING IN MACHINING: AN ANALYSIS OF DATA TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUES. EUREKA, Physics and Engineering, 2024(2), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.21303/2461-4262.2024.003294

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free