Reducing the time of sperm-oocyte interaction in human in-vitro fertilization improves the implantation rate

99Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Human oocyte development was evaluated after a reduced time exposure to spermatozoa in vitro. A total of 119 patients were assigned to two study groups in a randomized prospective study in which each patient's oocytes were exposed to spermatozoa for either 1 h (group 1-58 patients) or the standard 16 h incubation period (group 2-61 patients). The fertilization rate obtained in group 1 was higher than in group 2 (285/393, 73%, and 272/410, 66% respectively), suggesting that the spermatozoa-oocyte interaction occurs within 1 h. This was confirmed in a study in vitro using fluorescently labelled spermatozoa and normal oocyte-cumulus complexes, Spermatozoa enter the cumulus complex within 15 min, traverse the cumulus layer within 3 h, and first appear in the oocyte cortex at 4 h post-insemination. The incidence of polyspermy was higher in oocytes exposed to spermatozoa for 16 h (3%) than for 1 h (1%). There was no difference in the cleavage rate or morphological characteristics of embryos from both study groups. However, when evaluating the timing of embryo development, group 1 generated a significantly higher percentage of four to five cell embryos when compared to group 2 (55 versus 39%; P < 0.001), documented at 40 h post-insemination. The implantation and pregnancy rates for group 1 were 11 and 28%, while the corresponding rates for group 2 were 8 and 15%. This suggests that a reduced exposure of oocyte to spermatozoa favours embryo viability, possibly due to a decrease in potential damage from sperm metabolic waste products.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gianaroli, L., Magli, M. C., Ferraretti, A. P., Fiorentino, A., Tosti, E., Panzella, S., & Dale, B. (1996). Reducing the time of sperm-oocyte interaction in human in-vitro fertilization improves the implantation rate. Human Reproduction, 11(1), 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free