Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis or conventional intramedullary nailing for distal tibial fractures: A cohort study protocol

Abstract

Background:Currently, both minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) and intramedullary nailing are the two most commonly used methods of treatment in distal tibial fractures, but controversy still exists regarding the clinical effects of 2 techniques. Our purposes were to compare MIPO and intramedullary nailing for distal tibia shaft fractures by assessing functional outcomes and complications.Methods:Data were collected retrospectively from the charts of patients treated for distal tibial extra-articular fractures between May 2012 and July 2018. All cases were performed by a single surgeon. Institutional review board approval in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University was obtained prior to conducting chart review and analysis. The criteria for inclusion in the study were being aged at least 18 years at the time of diagnosis and having a closed or type I open fracture of the distal third of the tibial diaphysis. The primary outcome compared between the 2 groups was the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle surgery score. The secondary outcome measures in this trial included Olerud and Molander Ankle Score, radiographic outcomes, and complications. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version. P values < .05 were considered statistically significant.Results:We hypothesized that MIPO would be associated with better functional outcomes and fewer complications.Trial registration:This study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry5808).