Should antitrust consent decrees regulates post-merger pricing?

7Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Competitors proposing to merge sometimes propose price regulation in a consent decree as a condition of receiving merger approval. Antitrust enforcement agencies in the United States have been reluctant to use such price-regulating decrees, as they suffer from practical problems in implementation. It is less recognized, however, that the use of consent decrees to regulate post-merger prices may be unlawful. Such decrees exceed the scope of antitrust law and blur the distinction between the legislative power to regulate prices and the executive power to enforce the antitrust laws. Despite the willingness of merging parties to accept price regulation in consent decrees, economic and constitutional considerations counsel against antitrust enforcement agencies adopting this practice. © The Author (2007). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Malone, F., & Sidak, J. G. (2007). Should antitrust consent decrees regulates post-merger pricing? Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 3(3), 471–490. https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhm019

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free