Normative values for magnetic resonance elastography-based liver stiffness in a healthy population

8Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Chronic liver disease resulting in fibrosis, and ultimately cirrhosis, is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. None of the conventional imaging techniques are able to detect early fibrosis and compare its grade with the histopathologic scale. Liver biopsy, as the diagnostic standard for liver fibrosis, also has limitations and is not well accepted by patients. Magnetic resonance elastography is a well-established technique for evaluating liver stiffness and may replace invasive procedures. Detection of liver fibrosis in its early stages, however, requires a detailed knowledge of normal liver stiffness. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to determine normal liver stiffness values in healthy volunteers. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 102 volunteers (mean age, 21.6 years; range, 20-28 years) with no history of gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, or cardiovascular disease were enrolled in the study. Liver stiffness was evaluated by magnetic resonance elastography with a 1.5T clinical magnetic resonance scanner. Images of the induced transverse wave propagation were obtained and converted to tissue stiffness maps (elastograms). RESULTS The mean (SD) liver stiffness for the entire group of volunteers was 2.14 (0.28) kPa (range, 1.37-2.66 kPa). For women, the mean (SD) stiffness value was 2.14 (0.30) kPa (range, 1.37-2.66 kPa), and for men, 2.14 (0.25) kPa (range, 1.54-2.54 kPa). CONCLUSIONS Liver stiffness in a healthy adult cohort did not exceed 2.7 kPa and is not influenced by sex, body mass index, or fat content.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Obrzut, M., Atamaniuk, V., Obrzut, B., Ehman, R., Cholewa, M., Rzucidło, M., … Gutkowski, K. (2019). Normative values for magnetic resonance elastography-based liver stiffness in a healthy population. Polish Archives of Internal Medicine, 129(5), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.4456

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free