Endotoxin levels in farming: Absence of symptoms despite high exposure levels

55Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The endotoxin concentration in air was measured in farms where 11 farmers had experienced febrile reactions or allergic alveolitis and in a random sample of farms with 17 symptomless farmers. Samples were obtained during normal dairy farming in eight reference farms (background samples) and in all farms during the handling of material which had probably caused symptoms or disease or, in reference farms, maximal spore exposure (worst case samples). In addition, parallel samplers were used in reference farms, one with a cyclone (5 μm cutoff) and one without, to measure the dust and endotoxin concentrations in the respirable fraction and total dust. The endotoxin worst case varied from <0.01 to >50 μg/m3 in symptom farms (median 6.4 μg/m3, geometric mean 2.2 μg/m3) and from <0.01 to >50 μg/m3 in reference farms (median 42 μg/m3, geometric mean 29 μg/m3). This difference was not statistically significant. The background values in reference farms were 1.3 (median) and 0.4 (geometric mean) μg/m3. The differences between samples with and without cyclone and between background and worst case samples were statistically significant (p < 0.02). About 75% of the activity was found in the non-respirable fraction. No correlation was found between exposure to endotoxin and symptoms in farmers. There were weak, but statistically significant, correlations between endotoxin concentrations and total spore count or dust concentrations. The surprisingly high endotoxin values in the respirable fraction of air from environments which apparently did not cause symptoms raises the concern that the Limulus amebocyte assay might be sensitive to other components in the dust rather than endotoxin.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rask-Andersen, A., Malmberg, P., & Lundholm, M. (1989). Endotoxin levels in farming: Absence of symptoms despite high exposure levels. British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 46(6), 412–416. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.46.6.412

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free