Intervention programmes in mathematics and literacy: Teaching assistants' perceptions of their training and support

7Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We approach the recent argument put in this journal that teaching assistants (TAs) should be more strongly trained, monitored and supervised when teaching on intervention programmes. We suggest that the argument sits uneasily with wider management and educational literature. We examine TAs' experience of delivering important intervention programmes in mathematics and literacy. TAs report considerable variation in both their training and the quality of management involvement in their teaching. Consequently, we argue for an approach that includes TAs in a form of distributed leadership which recognises their specific capabilities rather than the model advocated both by government documents and by some researchers. © 2013 Taylor & Francis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Houssart, J., & Croucher, R. (2013). Intervention programmes in mathematics and literacy: Teaching assistants’ perceptions of their training and support. School Leadership and Management, 33(5), 427–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2013.800475

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free