Total pressure and annealing temperature effects on structure and photo-induce hydrophilicity of reactive DC sputtered TiO 2 thin films

11Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Nano-crystalline Titanium dioxide (TiO 2) has been well-known as a one of the most useful semiconductor material for application in self-cleaning coating which contains hydrophilic property. In this research, the films were deposited on un-heated silicon and glass slide substrates by home-made reactive unbalance magnetron sputtering system at various total gas pressures of 3.0×10 -3, 5.0×10 -3 and 7.0×10 -3 mbar. The as deposited thin films at 7.0×10 -3 mbar annealed in the ambient air at 100°C, 300 °C and 500°C, respectively. The effect of total pressure and annealing temperatures on structure, surface morphology and hydrophilic properties were characterized by X-ray Diffraction (XRD), Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) and contact angle meter under UV illumination. The results reveal that the crystal structure, surface morphology and photo-induce hydrophilicity were strongly influence by total pressure and annealing temperature. The films showed mixed phase of rutile and anatase. The phase transition from rutile to mixed phase of anatase/rutile was observed with increase total pressure. In addition, the roughness of the films deposited at different total pressure increased from 2.1 to 5.3 nm which give a greater hydrophicity. The enhancement of crystallinity and hydrophilic properties were obtained by varied the annealing temperature. The phase mixture of anatase/rutite and annealed temperature of 300°C show that the contact angle of thin film became 0° after UV light irradiation which exhibited clearly superhydrohilic property.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Buranawong, A., Witit-anun, N., & Chaiyakun, S. (2012). Total pressure and annealing temperature effects on structure and photo-induce hydrophilicity of reactive DC sputtered TiO 2 thin films. Engineering Journal, 16(3), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2012.16.3.79

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free