Inclusive deliberation and action in emerging RRI practices: the case of neuroimaging in security management

15Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

What does it mean to facilitate inclusive deliberation, a core aspect of Responsible Research and Innovation, at a very early stage in a controversial field such as security? We brought neuroscientists and security professionals together in a step-by-step fashion–interviews, focus groups and dialogue–to construct imaginaries of neuroimaging applications. Neuroscientists and security professionals related differently to neuroimaging investigation. Some of what the security professionals seek in neuroscience might better be provided by social psychology. However, neuroimaging can be imagined to aid professionalization through a theory-informed security management practice. Post-hoc reflection interviews were performed to identify impacts, such as reflexivity of the stakeholders, the formation of new relationships and actions. Our use of social psychology as a low-technology alternative brought into sharper focus where potential responsible security sector uses of neuroimaging lie. However, without on-going facilitation of interactions, this imaginary is likely to dissolve.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Jong, I. M., Kupper, F., & Broerse, J. (2016). Inclusive deliberation and action in emerging RRI practices: the case of neuroimaging in security management. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 3(1), 26–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2015.1137752

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free