review of the study of environmental modeling tools to understand the real impact of cosmetic products on environmental safety

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In contrast to human health risk assessment, there are no definitive guidelines for environmental risk assessment of cosmetic products. The objective of this study was to perform an in-depth analysis of ten modeling environmental tools and to establish the best rationale to assess the impact on environmental safety considering the recent global pandemic scenario and the evolution of the consumer mindset. A literature analysis was performed for the ten modeling environmental tools, and when possible, each was downloaded for comparison. Chesar was the tool that proved to be the easiest to enter data, and it has the more straightforward and direct application steps; thus, it was chosen for the initial assessment of ingredients that demonstrate potential environmental hazards. For high-level tools, it was not possible to establish a comparison for choice, as the models are private and have little data in the literature. Even so, for a more detailed assessment after the first initial assessment via Chesar, iSTREEM could be used. This study delivers important knowledge about the modeling tools and how to establish a rationale for environmental risk assessment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bianchi, C. I., & Campos, P. M. B. G. M. (2023). review of the study of environmental modeling tools to understand the real impact of cosmetic products on environmental safety. Biomedical and Biopharmaceutical Research, 20(1), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.19277/bbr.20.1.312

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free