Reflecting on reflexivity: Reflexive textual practices in organization and management theory

317Citations
Citations of this article
709Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper identifies four sets of textual practices that researchers in the field of organization and management theory (OMT) have used in their attempts to be reflexive. We characterize them as multi-perspective, multi-voicing, positioning and destabilizing. We show how each set of practices can help to produce reflexive research, but also how each embodies limitations and paradoxes. Finally, we consider the interplay among these sets of practices to develop ideas for new avenues for reflexive practice by OMT researchers. © Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2008.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alvesson, M., Hardy, C., & Harley, B. (2008). Reflecting on reflexivity: Reflexive textual practices in organization and management theory. Journal of Management Studies, 45(3), 480–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00765.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free