Sustainable Investments in Responsible SMEs: That’s What’s Distinguish Government VCs from Private VCs

7Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Researchers question the impact of governmental venture capitalists (GVC) compared to private venture capitalists (PVC), but we know little about why this difference occurs and if this criticism is justified. We observed a group of GVCs and developed a new model that describes the way that GVCs process signals pre- and post-decisions. Certain macro level factors severely undermine micro level performance, causing GVCs to financially underperform with respect to PVCs. This helped us to understand that GVCs do not make investment decisions in the same way as PVCs, and what undermines the performance of GVCs’ decision-making processes. The main goals of GVCs are to promote investments in responsible SMEs, mobilizing societal impact. We discuss that the criticism of GVC needs to be more nuanced, as they have a different role than PVC in the financial system as providers of sustainable investments in responsible SMEs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Johansson, J., Malmström, M., & Wincent, J. (2021). Sustainable Investments in Responsible SMEs: That’s What’s Distinguish Government VCs from Private VCs. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14010025

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free