Competition favors elk over beaver in a riparian willow ecosystem

  • Baker B
  • Peinetti H
  • Coughenour M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Beaver ( Castor spp.) conservation requires an understanding of their complex interactions with competing herbivores. Simulation modeling offers a controlled environment to examine long‐term dynamics in ecosystems driven by uncontrollable variables. We used a new version of the SAVANNA ecosystem model to investigate beaver ( C. canadensis ) and elk ( Cervus elaphus ) competition for willow ( Salix spp.). We initialized the model with field data from Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado, USA, to simulate a 4‐ha riparian ecosystem containing beaver, elk, and willow. We found beaver persisted indefinitely when elk density was ≤20 elk km −2 . Beaver persistence decreased exponentially as elk density increased from 30 to 60 elk km −2 , which suggests the presence of an ecological threshold. The interaction of beaver and elk herbivory shifted the size distribution of willow plants from tall to short when elk densities were ≥30 elk km −2 . The loss of tall willow preceded rapid beaver declines, thus willow condition may predict beaver population trajectory in natural environments. Beaver were able to persist with slightly higher elk densities if beaver alternated their use of foraging sites in a rest‐rotation pattern rather than maintained continuous use. Thus, we found asymmetrical competition for willow strongly favored elk over beaver in a simulated montane ecosystem. Finally, we discuss application of the SAVANNA model and mechanisms of competition relative to beaver persistence as metapopulations, ecological resistance and alternative state models, and ecosystem regulation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baker, B. W., Peinetti, H. R., Coughenour, M. B., & Johnson, T. L. (2012). Competition favors elk over beaver in a riparian willow ecosystem. Ecosphere, 3(11), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1890/es12-00058.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free