Rethinking debates in narrative methods: Narrative orthodoxy and research challenges with children with intellectual disability

9Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Undertaking narrative research with children with intellectual disability is a practical, ethical and methodological challenge. Rather than the traditional focus on how this challenge can be overcome, this paper takes up an alternative position by focusing on the relationship between disability and the wider narrative research environment. The focused commentary on the literature provided interjects into narrative methods debates by questioning what this challenge teaches us about the taken-for-granted tenets of the narrative approach. The commentary draws out broad themes from existing literature and is declared from the outset as operating from the theoretical field of critical disability studies. Specifically, the review takes up Fiona Kumari Campbell’s work on ableism, requiring that analysis and focus on amending problems that disability draws attention to does not remain with children with disability. Rather, a refocus towards implementing change within broader ableist practices, in this case within narrative research orthodoxy, is obligatory.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Flynn, S. (2019). Rethinking debates in narrative methods: Narrative orthodoxy and research challenges with children with intellectual disability. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 21(1), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.613

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free