Flow-diversion panacea or poison?

51Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Endovascular therapy is now the treatment of choice for intracranial aneurysms (IAs) for its efficacy and safety profile. The use of flow diversion (FD) has recently expanded to cover many types of IAs in various locations. Some institutions even attempt FD as first line treatment for unruptured IAs. The most widely used devices are the pipeline embolization device (PED), the SILK flow diverter (SFD), the flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED), and Surpass. Many questions were raised regarding the long-term complications, the optimal regimen of dual antiplatelet therapy, and the durability of treatment effect. We reviewed the literature to address these questions as well as other concerns on FD when treating IAs. © 2014 Zanaty, Chalouhi, Tjoumakaris, Rosenwasser, Gonzalez and Jabbour.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zanaty, M., Chalouhi, N., Tjoumakaris, S. I., Rosenwasser, R. H., Gonzalez, L. F., & Jabbour, P. (2014). Flow-diversion panacea or poison? Frontiers in Neurology. Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2014.00021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free