Double region of interest timing bolus technique following endovascular aortic repair: Short-term prognosis analysis

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the incidence rate of reintervention in patients with and without complication findings at aortic computed tomography using double region of interest timing bolus (DRTB) method after endovascular stent placement of the aorta. Methods: We included 40 patients who underwent computed tomography of the aorta using DRTB method after endovascular stent placement. DRTB method allows to scan the aorta with a short injection time of 9 s by synchronizing the scan speed to the aortic flow. Complication findings at computed tomography were defined as endoleak, rupture, occlusion, and infection. The primary endpoint was reintervention, which was defined as any of the following three events: conversion to open repair, graft revision, or secondary intervention. Results: The mean contrast medium during computed tomography angiography was 38.6 ± 3.9 mL. Complication findings at computed tomography were present in 10 patients (25%): endoleak (n = 9) and infection (n = 1). During a median follow-up of 7 months (interquartile range, 4–11 months), two patients experienced reintervention. Kaplan–Meier curves by complication findings showed that event rate at 6 months was significantly higher in patients with complication findings than in patients without (20% vs 0%, p = 0.01). No patients without complication findings at computed tomography experienced reintervention. Conclusions: No complication findings at computed tomography after intervention of the aorta resulted in good prognosis in patients who underwent aortic computed tomography using DRTB method.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tomizawa, N., Ito, S., Nakao, T., Arakawa, H., Yamamoto, K., Inoh, S., … Nakamura, S. (2020). Double region of interest timing bolus technique following endovascular aortic repair: Short-term prognosis analysis. Vascular, 28(3), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1708538119895403

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free