Ethnic variations in the incidence and mortality of stroke in the Scottish Health and Ethnicity Linkage Study of 4.65 million people

32Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Ethnic variations in stroke require more European studies, especially as differences are reportedly large. Methods: We created a retrospective cohort study of 4.65 million people in Scotland linking ethnicity from the census and stroke incidence and mortality from NHS databases. Rate ratios using direct age standardization and risk ratios were calculated, the latter to model the influence of educational qualification in a Poisson regression model.Results: Age-adjusted rate ratios varied little, compared to the White Scottish group (reference value 100) and the 95% CIs usually included 100, e.g. higher in Pakistani men (120.5, 95% CI 95.2-145.8) and in African men (137.9, 95% CI 91.5-184.4) but not in Pakistani or African women. Stroke rates were low in the Other White British (78.3, 95% CI 75.4-81.2 in men and 84.9, 95% CI 82.0-87.8 in women), Other White (89.8, 95% CI 81.5-98.1 in men and 88.8, 95% CI 80.9-96.7 in women) and Chinese men (70.3, 95% CI 45.7-94.8). Adjusting for highest educational qualification attenuated some and augmented other risk ratios, e.g. in Other White British men, the risk ratio changed from 71.4 to 80.2 (95% CI 74.2-86.6) and in African men from 124.2 to 138.8 (95% CI 107.7-178.8).Conclusions: Ethnic variations deserve further study, including in White European origin subgroups and the Chinese. Extremely high rates in South Asian and African origin were not corroborated in Scotland. Linkage methods are practical in Europe. © 2011 The European Society of Cardiology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bhopal, R. S., Bansal, N., Fischbacher, C. M., Brown, H., & Capewell, S. (2012). Ethnic variations in the incidence and mortality of stroke in the Scottish Health and Ethnicity Linkage Study of 4.65 million people. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 19(6), 1503–1508. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741826711423217

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free