Safe and Unsafe Housing for Domestic and Family Violence Survivors: Practitioner Perspectives

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Safe housing is necessary for women who have left a domestically violent relationship. However, there has been limited attention paid to the meanings of safety beyond refuges and crisis accommodation. This article strengthens the conceptualisation of safe and unsafe housing through a focus on practitioners’ definitions. Our analysis draws from focus groups with 30 practitioners across six services in Adelaide, Australia, working with young women to find and retain housing after a violent relationship ended. Practitioners understood safe housing as essential to women’s wellbeing but there was less clarity around its meaning. Practitioners focused on unsafe housing across three dimensions: un/safe relationships, un/safe dwellings and un/safe communities. IMPLICATIONS The provision of safe housing to women who have experienced domestic and family violence requires a recognition of its multiple dimensions beyond physical safety. Practitioners’ difficulty in defining safe housing may minimise their capacity to recognise housing as a “recuperative space” that facilitates women’s autonomy after leaving a violent partner. Successfully providing safe housing is a process that incorporates elements of being safe and unsafe.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Natalier, K., Wendt, S., & Goudie, S. (2024). Safe and Unsafe Housing for Domestic and Family Violence Survivors: Practitioner Perspectives. Australian Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2023.2289407

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free