An Argument for Colloid Resuscitation for Shock

8Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A focused review of the physiologic mechanisms of colloid and crystalloid fluid resuscitations for acute critical illness is presented. This review suggests that postresuscitation plasma volume, cardiac output, left ventricular mechanical performance, and global and microcirculatory O2 supplies are more favorable with colloid therapy. Conversely, crystalloid may adversely affect microcirculatory blood flow and resultant O2 supply and use by ischemic tissues in shock. Poor relief of global and regional hypoxia may persist in critically ill patients after resuscitation with crystalloid. Copyright © 1994, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rady, M. (1994). An Argument for Colloid Resuscitation for Shock. Academic Emergency Medicine, 1(6), 572–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.1994.tb02559.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free