Fiduciary Responsibility and the Green Energy Act, 2009 (Ontario, Canada)

4Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Analyses of the Green Energy Act (2009) have stated that the act had numerous shortcomings concerning the environmental impacts of the energy projects initiated within its purview. This account addresses the core points of divergence in the policy's creation that are responsible for the problematic effects. The crux of these problems comes from the ambiguity of the concept of green energy within the act due to its lack of a formal definition. The reasons for this anomaly originate from the Legislative Assembly of Ontario's address on the topic and their decision to let it remain ambiguous. This stance raises questions of whether they are fulfilling their fiduciary duties to an acceptable level. Although these questions of duty and obligation are both delicate and necessary when talking about projects that involve Canada's indigenous peoples, it is not limited to them due to the scope of the effects. Ultimately, although the policy was repealed in January 2019, there are many lessons that can be learned from the missteps of the Act.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tsuji, S. R. J. (2021). Fiduciary Responsibility and the Green Energy Act, 2009 (Ontario, Canada). Environmental Justice, 14(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2020.0017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free