Placental volume measured by three-dimensional ultrasound in the prediction of fetal α0-thalassemia: A preliminary report

24Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the use of placental volume measured by three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound in predicting fetal homozygous α0-thalassemia (Hb-Bart's disease). Methods: From June 2002 to May 2004 singleton pregnancies at risk of α0-thalassemia and normal controls were studied prospectively at 9-12 weeks of gestation. Affected fetuses were suspected to have α0-thalassemia by two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound and confirmed by DNA analysis. Placental volume was measured on 3D ultrasound by a multiplanar technique. Intra- and interobserver agreement of measurements was assessed. The placental volume/crown-rump length quotient of the affected fetuses was compared with that of normal fetuses. Results: The final study group comprised 105 pregnancies; 43 were at risk of α0-thalassemia and 62 were normal controls. Eleven (10.5%) fetuses were affected by α0-thalassemia, all from the at-risk group, and the others were normal. Intra- and interobserver agreement of volume measurement by 3D ultrasound was relatively poor; this was reflected in the wide limits of agreement, which ranged from -10.82 to 40.86 mL. The mean ± SD placental volume/crown-rump length quotient in affected pregnancies was larger than that in unaffected pregnancies (1.37 ± 0.65 vs. 1.13 ± 0.39), but this difference was not significant (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Assessment of placental volume by 3D ultrasound does not seem to be superior to 2D ultrasound in the first-trimester prediction of α0-thalassemia. Copyright © 2006 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, M., Leung, K. Y., Lee, C. P., Tang, M. H. Y., & Ho, P. C. (2006). Placental volume measured by three-dimensional ultrasound in the prediction of fetal α0-thalassemia: A preliminary report. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 28(2), 166–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.2721

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free