Endodontic and dental implant treatment: key considerations and comparisons: Literature Review

4Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There remains huge variability in decision-making when it comes to whether a compromised tooth requiring endodontic treatment should be saved, or extracted and replaced with an implant. Both internal and external biases, as well as inconsistent data from clinical studies, further complicate this frequent clinical conundrum. This paper presents tangible outcomes for both root-filled teeth and dental implants, together with comparative research to help clinicians better understand the available data. It is hoped that we can also highlight the key considerations when treatment planning for both root-filled teeth and dental implants. Both treatment modalities have excellent survival rates, but at the same time, neither is a panacea. Holistic and thoughtful consideration is required to help guide patients to make well-informed choices regarding their treatment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bhuva, B., Shah, P., & Mannocci, F. (2025, May 23). Endodontic and dental implant treatment: key considerations and comparisons: Literature Review. British Dental Journal. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-025-8337-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free