Study on the limitation for detecting anaerobic threshold by respiratory frequency

Abstract

It has been reported that respiratory frequency (F) serves to determine anaerobic threshold (AT). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the method detecting AT by using F is influenced by the subject's condition such as the existence of sport experiences. Ten healthy adults volunteered to perform progressive cycle ergometer exercise with workloads increased by 30-W (female:20-W) every 2 min at 60 rpm. VO2 at AT were determined by four different methods, which detect the point of 1)nonlinear increase in VE, VCO2, and increase in VE/VO2 without increasing in VE/VCO2 (AT-v), 2) nonlinear increase in F (visual estimation: AT-VF), 3) inflection in F by multisegment linear regression (AT-CF), 4) inflection with omitting above RC point as with 3) (AT-CF2). The mean VO2 at AT-VF (40.8 +/- 9.2 ml/kg/min) and AT-CF (42.7 +/- 9.9 ml/kg/min) was significantly higher compared with AT-V (28.2 +/- 10.4 ml/kg/min) and not RC (42.3 +/- 10.0 ml/kg/min). It would be possible that AT-VF and AT-CF indicated RC, but not AT. There were no significant differences between AT-CF2 (28.2 +/- 10.9 ml/kg/min) and AT-V, and a highly positive correlation (r = 0.79, p less than 0.05) was observed between them. It was recognized that F reached a plateau at AT in four of the subjects. The error between AT-V and AT-CF2 was observed individual variations and the error between them within 5% was observed in only one subject. These results suggest that F is inadequate as an indicator of the AT, because F may be influenced by entrainment of breathing and pedalling frequency.