Repentance as Rebuke: Betrayal and Moral Injury in Safety Engineering

1Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Following other contributions about the MAX accidents to this journal, this paper explores the role of betrayal and moral injury in safety engineering related to the U.S. federal regulator’s role in approving the Boeing 737MAX—a plane involved in two crashes that together killed 346 people. It discusses the tension between humility and hubris when engineers are faced with complex systems that create ambiguity, uncertain judgements, and equivocal test results from unstructured situations. It considers the relationship between moral injury, principled outrage and rebuke when the technology ends up involved in disasters. It examines the corporate backdrop against which calls for enhanced employee voice are typically made, and argues that when engineers need to rely on various protections and moral inducements to ‘speak up,’ then the ethical essence of engineering—skepticism, testing, checking, and questioning—has already failed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dekker, S. W. A., Layson, M. D., & Woods, D. D. (2022). Repentance as Rebuke: Betrayal and Moral Injury in Safety Engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 28(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00412-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free