Institutionalized norms of conducting research and social realities: A research synthesis of empirical works from 1983 to 2002

43Citations
Citations of this article
126Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Based on a systematic review of the last 20 years of empirical research grounded in institutional theory, we identify some of the main norms of conducting research in this literature. The level of institutions, the formal/informal institutional pillars and the direction of effects are the foundation of these norms addressed by researchers in the last two decades. This review indicates that empirical research is well behind changes in social realities. This may be related to both the institutionalization process that takes place in any academic research and to the suggested difficulty that scholars find in moving away from widely accepted research models and practices, given the context within which they evolve. It is also concluded that local/national regulative institutions are giving up their position to more global normative and cognitive organizational field institutions. As the business environment become more global, giving more importance to transnational and informal institutions will be more crucial in institutional analysis of organizations. © Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2005.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Farashahi, M., Hafsi, T., & Molz, R. (2005). Institutionalized norms of conducting research and social realities: A research synthesis of empirical works from 1983 to 2002. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00104.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free