An Exploratory Evaluation of Three Interfaces for Browsing Large Hierarchical Tables of Contents

57Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Three different interfaces were used to browse a large 1994 table of contents. A fully expanded stable interface, expand/contract interface, and multipane interface were studied in a between-groups experiment with 41 novice participants. Nine timed fact retrieval tasks were performed; each task is analyzed and discussed separately. We found that both the expand/contract and multipane interfaces produced significantly faster times than the stable interface for many tasks using this large hierarchy; other advantages of the expand/contract and multipane interfaces over the stable interface are discussed. The animation characteristics of the expand/contract interface appear to play a major role. Refinements to the multipane and expand/contract interfaces are suggested. A predictive model for measuring navigation effort of each interface is presented. © 1994, ACM. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chimera, R., & Shneiderman, B. (1994). An Exploratory Evaluation of Three Interfaces for Browsing Large Hierarchical Tables of Contents. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 12(4), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1145/185462.185483

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free