Abstract
Three different interfaces were used to browse a large 1994 table of contents. A fully expanded stable interface, expand/contract interface, and multipane interface were studied in a between-groups experiment with 41 novice participants. Nine timed fact retrieval tasks were performed; each task is analyzed and discussed separately. We found that both the expand/contract and multipane interfaces produced significantly faster times than the stable interface for many tasks using this large hierarchy; other advantages of the expand/contract and multipane interfaces over the stable interface are discussed. The animation characteristics of the expand/contract interface appear to play a major role. Refinements to the multipane and expand/contract interfaces are suggested. A predictive model for measuring navigation effort of each interface is presented. © 1994, ACM. All rights reserved.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Chimera, R., & Shneiderman, B. (1994). An Exploratory Evaluation of Three Interfaces for Browsing Large Hierarchical Tables of Contents. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 12(4), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1145/185462.185483
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.