Dermatologists' accuracy in early diagnosis of melanoma of the nail matrix

62Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To measure and compare the accuracy of 4 different clinical methods in the diagnosis of melanoma in situ of the nail matrix among dermatologists with different levels of clinical experience. Design: Twelve cases of melanonychias (5 melanomas and 7 nonmelanomas) were presented following 4 successive steps: (1) clinical evaluation, (2) evaluation according to the ABCDEF rule, (3) dermoscopy of the nail plate, and (4) intraoperative dermoscopy. At each step, the dermatologists were asked to decide if the lesion was a melanoma. Setting: The test was administered at 2 dermatological meetings in 2008. Participants: A total of 152 dermatologists, including 11 nail experts, 53 senior dermatologists, and 88 junior dermatologists. Main Outcome Measures: The answers were evaluated as percentage of right answers for each diagnostic step according to the different grade of expertise. Differences among the percentage of right answers in the different steps were evaluated with the z test at a 5% level of significance. The agreement was investigated using Cohen κ statistic. Results: The only method that statistically influenced the correct diagnosis for each category (experts, seniors, and juniors) was intraoperative dermoscopy (z test; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Di Chiacchio, N., Hirata, S. H., Enokihara, M. Y., Michalany, N. S., Fabbrocini, G., & Tosti, A. (2010). Dermatologists’ accuracy in early diagnosis of melanoma of the nail matrix. Archives of Dermatology, 146(4), 382–387. https://doi.org/10.1001/archdermatol.2010.27

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free