Bullying in the Academic work Environment at King Saud University from the Perspective of the Faculty Members

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: The study aimed to identify the forms of bullying in the academic work environment, reveal its causes, and provide suggested solutions to combat and reduce it. Methods: The study was conducted on a sample of 361 faculty members at King Saud University, chosen using the stratified random method. The descriptive analytical approach was used as a research methodology, and a questionnaire tool was applied to collect data. Results: The findings of the study showed that among the forms of bullying that obtained a high degree of agreement from the study sample were deliberate isolation and exclusion from committees, activities, and events; obstruction of important goals such as access to academic leadership positions or benefiting from university resources; and settling personal scores through means such as performance evaluation, hindering job promotion, and discussing scientific theses/dissertations. The study findings also showed a very high degree of agreement among the study sample members on the causes of bullying, including the lack of anti-bullying policies and the absence of a culture promoting human rights in the academic work environment. Conclusion: The study concluded that establishing an anti-bullying policy at the university, the adoption of a framework by the university administration to change the culture of tolerance and condoning of bullying, and raising awareness among faculty members about the anti-bullying policy and its written rules through awareness programs are among the suggested solutions for combating bullying, which received a very high degree of agreement from study participants.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alqahtani, N. (2023). Bullying in the Academic work Environment at King Saud University from the Perspective of the Faculty Members. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 50(2), 539–552. https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v50i2.4960

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free