Abstract
Purpose: comparing the influence of different tooth preparation and bonding techniques on the fracture resistance of tooth fragment reattachment. Materials and method: Ninety bovine central incisors were selected. Fifteen teeth act as a control (Group A). Experimental specimens were sectioned at the mesial-incisal proximal edge 3 mm from the incisal edge in a labio-lingual direction at 25degree inclination apically. Experimental specimens were then divided into five groups according to the tooth reattachment techniques utilized; Group B: no tooth preparation + Cured bond + Flowable composite; Group C: no tooth preparation + Uncured bond + Flowable composite; Group D: Bevel + bond + Flowable composite; Group E: Over-contouring + bond + Nanohybrid composite; Group F: Over-contouring + bond + Flowable composite. Specimens were subjected to thermocycling between 5 °C and 55 °C for 500 cycles with 30 sec. dwell time. Fracture strength was evaluated using universal testing machine. Data was analyzed using One-way ANOVA. Results: There was a statistically significant difference between Group A and all the experimental groups, p
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Nagi, S. M., & Khadr, S. M. (2021). Influence of different tooth preparation and bonding techniques on the fracture resistance of tooth fragment reattachment. Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry, 8(1), 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2021.1952873
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.