Influence of different tooth preparation and bonding techniques on the fracture resistance of tooth fragment reattachment

5Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: comparing the influence of different tooth preparation and bonding techniques on the fracture resistance of tooth fragment reattachment. Materials and method: Ninety bovine central incisors were selected. Fifteen teeth act as a control (Group A). Experimental specimens were sectioned at the mesial-incisal proximal edge 3 mm from the incisal edge in a labio-lingual direction at 25degree inclination apically. Experimental specimens were then divided into five groups according to the tooth reattachment techniques utilized; Group B: no tooth preparation + Cured bond + Flowable composite; Group C: no tooth preparation + Uncured bond + Flowable composite; Group D: Bevel + bond + Flowable composite; Group E: Over-contouring + bond + Nanohybrid composite; Group F: Over-contouring + bond + Flowable composite. Specimens were subjected to thermocycling between 5 °C and 55 °C for 500 cycles with 30 sec. dwell time. Fracture strength was evaluated using universal testing machine. Data was analyzed using One-way ANOVA. Results: There was a statistically significant difference between Group A and all the experimental groups, p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nagi, S. M., & Khadr, S. M. (2021). Influence of different tooth preparation and bonding techniques on the fracture resistance of tooth fragment reattachment. Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry, 8(1), 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2021.1952873

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free