Separating symbolic and active representation: a mixed methods study of gender and education in China

44Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Bureaucracies representative of the public can affect programme outcomes either through active representation by bureaucrats or symbolic representation via changes in client behaviour. Separating out these different aspects of representation requires understanding the interaction of bureaucrats and clients which is difficult using only quantitative data. Using individual-level quantitative analysis of Chinese education data, we find gender representation exists. Qualitative interviews of teachers, students and school principals, however, indicate that the effects are most likely not from active representation but rather via the symbolic representation through role-model effects.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xu, X., & Meier, K. J. (2022). Separating symbolic and active representation: a mixed methods study of gender and education in China. Public Management Review, 24(9), 1429–1451. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1900352

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free