Empirical performance of alternative option pricing models

1.4kCitations
Citations of this article
364Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Substantial progress has been made in developing more realistic option pricing models. Empirically, however, it is not known whether and by how much each generalization improves option pricing and hedging. We fill this gap by first deriving an option model that allows volatility, interest rates and jumps to be stochastic. Using S&P 500 options, we examine several alternative models from three perspectives: (1) internal consistency of implied parameters/volatility with relevant time-series data, (2) out-of-sample pricing, and (3) hedging. Overall, incorporating stochastic volatility and jumps is important for pricing and internal consistency. But for hedging, modeling stochastic volatility alone yields the best performance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bakshi, G., Charles, C., & Chen, Z. (1997). Empirical performance of alternative option pricing models. Journal of Finance, 52(5), 2003–2049. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02749.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free