Assessing Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B: Liver Biopsy or Non-Invasive Fibrosis Markers?

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The accurate evaluation of the fibrosis stage is critical for improving chronic hepatitis B (CHB) management and patient outcomes. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive fibrosis markers with liver biopsy for detecting significant, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. We further investigated the diagnostic performance of non-invasive markers according to HBeAg status to provide further insight into their clinical utility across patient subgroups. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 536 treatment-naive patients with CHB who underwent liver biopsy. Patients were categorized into four groups according to the fibrosis stage: “no significant fibrosis” (F0–F2), “significant fibrosis” (F3–F6), “advanced fibrosis” (F4–F6), and “cirrhosis” (F5–F6). AAR, AAPRI, APRI, API, FIB-4, GPR, and S–index were compared among these groups. Results: In total, 536 treatment-naïve patients were analyzed (63.2% male; mean age 44.8 ± 12.9 years), of whom 25.4% were HBeAg-positive. API, FIB 4, GPR, and S-Index showed good performance (area under the curve [AUC] ≥ 0.8–0.9) in defining advanced fibrosis (≥F4), AAPRI, AAR, API, and APRI showed good performance ([AUC] < 0.700) in defining cirrhosis. The analysis showed that GPR had the highest AUC for ≥F3 (0.719) and ≥F4 (0.838), while FIB 4 had the highest AUC for cirrhosis (0.865). Conclusions: These findings highlight the value of non-invasive markers as inexpensive and easily applicable methods for clinicians in assessing the stage of liver fibrosis. The integration of these scores into the routine monitoring of chronic hepatitis B patients is expected to expand, enhancing clinical decision-making and reducing the necessity for liver biopsies.