In Situ Tests on the Flexural Strength and Effective Elastic Modulus of Brackish Ice During Different Ice Periods

2Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Global warming reduces the thickness and duration of seasonal lake ice, increasing the risk of ice cover failure. To investigate the bending behavior of ice cover, six groups of full-scale cantilever beam tests were conducted on a brackish water lake during the winter of 2023–2024, covering the following three ice periods: growth, stable, and melt. A total of 16 upward-loaded beams and 24 downward-loaded beams were tested. The results showed that the flexural strength of brackish ice was 374.21 ± 99.93 kPa, and the effective elastic modulus was 2.77 ± 0.93 GPa. The square root of bulk porosity, fitted with an exponential function, is the optimal predictor of flexural performance. Both flexural strength and effective elastic modulus systematically decreased with increasing porosity, and empirical regression formulas were established. On average, downward-loaded flexural strength was approximately 17.3% to 38.8% higher than upward-loaded strength, whereas elastic modulus showed no significant difference between the two loading directions. Flexural mechanical properties during the melt period reduced significantly, with a strength and modulus about 33.0% to 61.1% lower than those in the growth and stable periods. Comparisons with existing datasets demonstrate that the mechanical properties of brackish ice are lower than those of freshwater ice but higher than those of sea ice. This study provides new in situ data on the full-scale flexural mechanical properties of brackish ice and offers an important basis for assessing ice loads in lakes and estuarine environments under climate change.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ji, S., Liu, Y., Wang, Q., Lu, P., & Yuan, S. (2025). In Situ Tests on the Flexural Strength and Effective Elastic Modulus of Brackish Ice During Different Ice Periods. Water (Switzerland), 17(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/w17223189

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free