A new approach for fat removal in a discontinuous autotransfusion device–concept and evaluation

4Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Fat present during blood salvage in orthopaedic or cardiac surgery can pose a risk of fat embolism and should be eliminated before transfusion. Based on observations of central fat accumulation at the bottom of Latham bowls, a fat reduction program was developed using two volume displacements, where blood temporarily is removed and respun in the bowl to force the fat through the RBC sediment. Materials and methods: Pooled ABO-matched RBC and FFP were adjusted to a haematocrit of 10%, and human fat tissue added to a concentration of 1·25 vol%. In six experiments, blood was processed with the new-generation cell salvage device CS Elite in a newly developed fat reduction program in bowls of three sizes. Volumetric quantification of fat was performed after centrifugation of blood samples in Pasteur pipettes. From volumes, haematocrits and the concentrations of fat, RBC recovery and fat elimination rates were calculated. Results: Fat removal rates of 93·2 ± 2·8, 97·0 ± 2·1 and 99·6 ± 0·3% were observed with a 70-ml, 125-ml and 225-ml bowl, respectively, and even higher rates when removal rates were calculated one cycle. At the same time, high RBC recovery and plasma elimination rates were maintained, not significantly different to the default program mode. Conclusion: Modifications in process parameters and sequence led to a fat reduction program that significantly improves fat removal with the Cell Saver Elite from 77·4 ± 5·1% in the default mode to an average of 98·6 ± 1·1%, yielding results equivalent to the continuous cell salvage system (C.A.T.S).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Seyfried, T. F., Gruber, M., Pawlik, M. T., Kasper, S., Mandle, R. J., & Hansen, E. (2017). A new approach for fat removal in a discontinuous autotransfusion device–concept and evaluation. Vox Sanguinis, 112(8), 759–766. https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.12574

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free