Social network analysis in archaeology

110Citations
Citations of this article
193Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Social network analysis (SNA) in archaeology has become important for a range of theoretical and methodological approaches that can more generally be characterized as relational. They are relational in that it is the ties between actors (or nodes) that define social connections. Archaeologists are currently employing a diversity of theoretical approaches to networks, and the perspective taken in this review is that SNA can provide insights into a number of different social processes using different theories. Following a brief historical overview, I discuss two aspects of SNA: The structural position of the actor or node, and characterizations of whole networks. I then summarize several broad classes of archaeological networks: Historical, spatial, and material. I conclude with a call for more bridging approaches to span alternative theoretical and methodological approaches in the archaeology of networks.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mills, B. J. (2017, October 23). Social network analysis in archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology. Annual Reviews Inc. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041423

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free