Sortition, Parties and Political Careerism

3Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

One reason for growing distrust of politicians, parties, and governments is the increase in ‘careerism’: politicians who have never worked outside politics and seem to work inside politics for themselves as much as for the common good. Sortition—choosing representatives by lottery—is one solution. However, random selection of representatives breaks the accountability link provided by elections and leaves amateur politicians at the mercy of their civil servants. It would, critics argue, destroy competitive party politics, the foundation of modern democracy. We suggest that parties select their candidates through sortition of party members, with successful incumbent MPs standing again. This would mitigate the ills of patronage and adverse selection without losing professionalism and political experience. It would encourage deliberation and the proper persuasive and representation function of parties, alongside the accountability that elections provide. It would also, we suggest, lead to better advice to politicians from policy units within and outside the public service.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dowding, K., Bosworth, W., & Giuliani, A. (2025). Sortition, Parties and Political Careerism. Political Quarterly, 96(4), 660–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.13530

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free